<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Hyper-V on Server Core actually sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about life, the universe and everything else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yi Wang</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-8845</link>
		<dc:creator>Yi Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-8845</guid>
		<description>Similarly, hyper-v server is a un-usable product(or call it crap) out of the box. It requires you to search around and follow N-steps instructions (where N &gt; 10) for how to configure and use it. My guess is that the team@Microsoft  releases hyper-v server purely just for the release party. If there is a guy responsible for the usability of hyper-v server, he should be fired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarly, hyper-v server is a un-usable product(or call it crap) out of the box. It requires you to search around and follow N-steps instructions (where N &gt; 10) for how to configure and use it. My guess is that the team@Microsoft  releases hyper-v server purely just for the release party. If there is a guy responsible for the usability of hyper-v server, he should be fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-7572</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-7572</guid>
		<description>I think Hyper-V Server is awesome - been using it for months, there were some nic and video driver issues at first but no more.  I have it running a desktop as a test but worked without issue so I moved it to production - maybe the best thing MS has done.  I&#039;m running the beta R2, it is also great.  As far as managing goes, mcc does everything some hardware and there are countless sites with commandline info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Hyper-V Server is awesome &#8211; been using it for months, there were some nic and video driver issues at first but no more.  I have it running a desktop as a test but worked without issue so I moved it to production &#8211; maybe the best thing MS has done.  I&#8217;m running the beta R2, it is also great.  As far as managing goes, mcc does everything some hardware and there are countless sites with commandline info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-6621</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-6621</guid>
		<description>Yes Hyper-v Core SUCKS, I recently installed hyper-v core, and after several hours of deployment download several patches, useless microsoft documentation (at first place those documentation said &quot;go to www.microsoft.com/hyper-v and download the hyper-v Management console for Microsoft windows vista sp1, reboot and you can acces it&quot; well that&#039;s a compleate LIE), and reading the &quot;virtual PC Guy&#039;s&quot; (http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy) and the Jhon Howard blog (http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2008/03/28/part-1-hyper-v-remote-management-you-do-not-have-the-requested-permission-to-complete-this-task-contact-the-administrator-of-the-authorization-policy-for-the-computer-computername.aspx), and runned his script to allow remotelly administrate the Virtual Machines (that script rocks!, but useless at the end), and after redo all the procedure manually, I can certainly access to the Hyper-v MMC.

Can create, modify and delete without problems but if i start a virtual machine, I cannot connet to it!, reviewed all the Documentation, event logs and no error/warning/info is reported.

Cannot paste the image of the screen but thanks to the less usefull, windows vista trick
I post the text version of this screen.

[Window Title]
Conexión a máquina virtual

[Main Instruction]
No se puede conectar a la máquina virtual. Vuelva a intentar la conexión. Si el problema persiste, póngase en contacto con el administrador del sistema.

¿Desea intentar conectar de nuevo?

[Conectar] [Salir]

(sorry it&#039;s in spanish and says

[Window Title]
Connection to virtual machine 

[Main Instruction]
Is not possible to connect to the virtual machine, if the problem persist, contact to your system administrator.

Do you want to try again?

[Connect] [Exit]
&quot;

Hyper-v Sucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Hyper-v Core SUCKS, I recently installed hyper-v core, and after several hours of deployment download several patches, useless microsoft documentation (at first place those documentation said &#8220;go to <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/hyper-v" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/hyper-v</a> and download the hyper-v Management console for Microsoft windows vista sp1, reboot and you can acces it&#8221; well that&#8217;s a compleate LIE), and reading the &#8220;virtual PC Guy&#8217;s&#8221; (<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy</a>) and the Jhon Howard blog (<a href="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2008/03/28/part-1-hyper-v-remote-management-you-do-not-have-the-requested-permission-to-complete-this-task-contact-the-administrator-of-the-authorization-policy-for-the-computer-computername.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2008/03/28/part-1-hyper-v-remote-management-you-do-not-have-the-requested-permission-to-complete-this-task-contact-the-administrator-of-the-authorization-policy-for-the-computer-computername.aspx</a>), and runned his script to allow remotelly administrate the Virtual Machines (that script rocks!, but useless at the end), and after redo all the procedure manually, I can certainly access to the Hyper-v MMC.</p>
<p>Can create, modify and delete without problems but if i start a virtual machine, I cannot connet to it!, reviewed all the Documentation, event logs and no error/warning/info is reported.</p>
<p>Cannot paste the image of the screen but thanks to the less usefull, windows vista trick<br />
I post the text version of this screen.</p>
<p>[Window Title]<br />
Conexión a máquina virtual</p>
<p>[Main Instruction]<br />
No se puede conectar a la máquina virtual. Vuelva a intentar la conexión. Si el problema persiste, póngase en contacto con el administrador del sistema.</p>
<p>¿Desea intentar conectar de nuevo?</p>
<p>[Conectar] [Salir]</p>
<p>(sorry it&#8217;s in spanish and says</p>
<p>[Window Title]<br />
Connection to virtual machine </p>
<p>[Main Instruction]<br />
Is not possible to connect to the virtual machine, if the problem persist, contact to your system administrator.</p>
<p>Do you want to try again?</p>
<p>[Connect] [Exit]<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>Hyper-v Sucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramsy</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>ramsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>Hyper-V installation and management SUCKS...big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hyper-V installation and management SUCKS&#8230;big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Wilson</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>Hyper-V would be nice if you could use the current System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2007 to control it. I mean wow Microsoft you out date a expensive piece of software in under a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hyper-V would be nice if you could use the current System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2007 to control it. I mean wow Microsoft you out date a expensive piece of software in under a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The things that are better left unspoken : Handling Server Core Roles and Features</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>The things that are better left unspoken : Handling Server Core Roles and Features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>[...] Core Roles and Features of Windows Server 2008 Install a role on a Server Core Windows 2008&#160; When Hyper-V on Server Core actually sucks&#160; Server Core Roles &amp; Features of Windows Server 2008&#160; Server CORE Windows Server 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Core Roles and Features of Windows Server 2008 Install a role on a Server Core Windows 2008&#160; When Hyper-V on Server Core actually sucks&#160; Server Core Roles &amp; Features of Windows Server 2008&#160; Server CORE Windows Server 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>Yeah I know I can do it from a Vista PC, but I don&#039;t want to have to use another machine to set it up. Perhaps a live CD would be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I know I can do it from a Vista PC, but I don&#8217;t want to have to use another machine to set it up. Perhaps a live CD would be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1966</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-1966</guid>
		<description>Vista SP1 plus the management pack download.  I suppose if MMC was installable on server core you&#039;d think it was less secure? The purpose of server core, as far as I understand it is to increase security rather than be just cool.  From what I&#039;ve seen on the blogs it looks like you can use WMI locally to manage hyper-v.  Otherwise, just using Vista SP1 with MMC &amp; hyper-v tools sounds like a good idea to me personally, and it will keep your server core installation nice and &#039;thin&#039;.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista SP1 plus the management pack download.  I suppose if MMC was installable on server core you&#8217;d think it was less secure? The purpose of server core, as far as I understand it is to increase security rather than be just cool.  From what I&#8217;ve seen on the blogs it looks like you can use WMI locally to manage hyper-v.  Otherwise, just using Vista SP1 with MMC &amp; hyper-v tools sounds like a good idea to me personally, and it will keep your server core installation nice and &#8216;thin&#8217;.  <img src='http://craign.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craign.net/2008/03/19/when-hyper-v-on-server-core-actually-sucks/#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>You need help! I have installed Hyper-V on core with great results. Try this link http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=518d870c-fa3e-4f6a-97f5-acaf31de6dce&amp;DisplayLang=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need help! I have installed Hyper-V on core with great results. Try this link <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=518d870c-fa3e-4f6a-97f5-acaf31de6dce&amp;DisplayLang=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=518d870c-fa3e-4f6a-97f5-acaf31de6dce&amp;DisplayLang=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
